Because at the process / runtime level, harnesses are entirely replaceable by models bitter-lesson-style, what’s left, and it should be obvious since OpenClaw, is accessibility and distribution. This is entirely the domain of hyperscallers. Making a harness today with the hypot
@sadasant Perhaps, but it gets interesting if you can harness any “dumber”/cheaper/smaller/locally run? models and have them do what they otherwise wouldn’t be able to do standalone.
@sadasant Hmmm. Well, harnesses can definitely improve/enhance “integration” along some, or many” dimensions. If done properly, to help bridge disjointed possibility domains, it can reduce friction which… can improve productivity?
@sadasant Yup, this all tracks,and I’m landing in a similar play space; pty mux, HCLI, smarter orchestrator vs dumber task handlers. It just seems to want to grow that way organically.